Vetoable Trade? - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Commissioner's Corner

Vetoable Trade?

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Vetoable Trade?

Postby thegilby » Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:35 am

Hi all, this trade came through and I'm kind of concerned...

Team 1 gets: Utley, Swisher, F. Cordero, Prior
Team 2 gets: Delgado, Cano, Kazmir, C. Young (SD)

Rounds the players were drafted:

Team 1 gets: 1, 8, 13, 19
Team 2 gets: 4, 5, 6, 9

Anyone else have any opinions?

6X6 (regular 5x5 categories with IP and OPS), H2H, Keeper league
thegilby
College Coach
College Coach


Posts: 320
Joined: 27 Feb 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Bloody Sox » Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:21 am

I'd rather be Team 1, but I don't think it's vetoable. In fact, I would have rather been Team 2 before the draft, but I would have drafted differently :-)
"The government cannot give to anyone anything that it does not first take from someone else"
Bloody Sox
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 2148
(Past Year: 18)
Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Fenway Park, RF Roof Deck

Postby jlm53089 » Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:16 pm

its an even trade.
i wouldnt veto it.
not too lopsided people are getting what they need in the end.
Image
jlm53089
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Pick 3 Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 3058
(Past Year: 3)
Joined: 6 Feb 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Tampa, praying for a new stadium.

Postby commence8 » Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:21 pm

I wouldn't veto either, it's close enough.
commence8
College Coach
College Coach

User avatar

Posts: 262
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Philly Burbs

Postby Trojan Pony » Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:27 pm

agree with the consensus here.

as a general rule i don't veto unless i suspect collusion between the managers or it's obvious one of the managers is getting played and really doesn't know what he's doing. if it's pretty close and both managers have legitimate reasons for doing the trade then let it go, even if it might seem lopsided...
Trojan Pony
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1938
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Tri-State Area

Postby walkoffblast » Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:02 pm

Team 1 is winning that trade by more than most are suggesting but it is hard to veto it. If you want to look at it by draft position it is pretty bad. I doubt many people would want to trade 4,5,6 for 1st rounder and 13 rounders which is essentially what happened. In the end you let them have it rewarding them for working out a smart deal and try and take advantage of the dumb team yourself.
walkoffblast
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 518
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Lenny6 » Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:26 pm

I don't seen anything at all wrong with that trade. Perhaps team 2 really needs starting pitching help and has enough offense to absorb the loss of Utley. Cano is still a top 2B in his own right so that softens the blow as well. Absolutely no reason to veto this. And I agree that trades should only be vetoed when it is obvious that one team is purposely dumping its best players (and that is even harder to determine in a keeper league where lopsided trades at midseason are common). Why would anyone do that before the season starts?
Lenny6
College Coach
College Coach


Posts: 256
(Past Year: 31)
Joined: 5 Feb 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby chadlincoln » Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:22 pm

I think it's a very even trade actually.
7/26 - Cafe goes down:

General Error
SQL ERROR [ mysql4 ]
Table './cafe_forums/baseball_sessions' is marked as crashed and should be repaired [145]
An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an administrator if this problem persists.
chadlincoln
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Cafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeWeb Supporter
Posts: 10983
Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Bleachers at Wrigley Field

Postby bologna_sandwich » Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:43 pm

Yep---looks legit. No veto.
bologna_sandwich
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 778
Joined: 5 Jun 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Chip1010 » Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:23 am

Looks fine to me, absolutely. No veto.
Chip1010
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 673
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: San Diego, by way of the Puget Sound

Next

Return to Commissioner's Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Tuesday, Jul. 29
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

LA Angels at Baltimore
(7:05 pm)
Seattle at Cleveland
(7:05 pm)
Chi White Sox at Detroit
(7:08 pm)
Milwaukee at Tampa Bay
(7:10 pm)
indoors
Philadelphia at NY Mets
(7:10 pm)
Washington at Miami
(7:10 pm)
indoors
Arizona at Cincinnati
(7:10 pm)
Toronto at Boston
(7:10 pm)
Colorado at Chi Cubs
(8:05 pm)
NY Yankees at Texas
(8:05 pm)
Oakland at Houston
(8:10 pm)
Minnesota at Kansas City
(8:10 pm)
Atlanta at LA Dodgers
(10:10 pm)
St. Louis at San Diego
(10:10 pm)
Pittsburgh at San Francisco
(10:15 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact