Pogotheostrich wrote:Chance just missed the making the poll.
chace isn't even top 20. just because he was in a poem, doesn't mean he deseveres to be in the HOF.
Gehrig was a great player, but i think he is rated too high by some people. If he really was one of the ten best baseball players ever, shouldn't the yankees have won more World Series when he and Ruth were on the same teams?
Not neccesarily(sp?), froggy. There are many more factors in winning the World Series than your first baseman and right ielder. Come on, pitching, defense, other players.
they had 3 hall of fame pitchers for most of that era. Red Ruffing, Lefty Gomez, and Waite Hoyt.
Pogotheostrich wrote:Chance just missed the making the poll.
chace isn't even top 20. just because he was in a poem, doesn't mean he deseveres to be in the HOF.
Gehrig was a great player, but i think he is rated too high by some people. If he really was one of the ten best baseball players ever, shouldn't the yankees have won more World Series when he and Ruth were on the same teams?
Not neccesarily(sp?), froggy. There are many more factors in winning the World Series than your first baseman and right ielder. Come on, pitching, defense, other players.
they had 3 hall of fame pitchers for most of that era. Red Ruffing, Lefty Gomez, and Waite Hoyt.
They did have to beat Connie Mack's A's for a few pennants. From 1929-31 the A's were truly a great team...
Even though his numbers do not compare to Gherig's I voted for Greenberg. He voluntarily enlisted after the bombing of Pearl Harbour and missed almost 4 of his prime seasons. He hit .340 with 41 HR in 1940, then he went into the army and when he came back to baseball he hit 44 HR in 1946. Imagine if he had played all of those years, he would give Gherig a run for his money. So out of respect this vote goes to Greenberg.