What They Should Have Done - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2015 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Baseball Leftovers

What They Should Have Done

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

What They Should Have Done

Postby daullaz » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:41 pm

What the Dodgers should have done:

The Dodgers signed five players to large contracts for the 2007 season. Including signing bonuses, Nomar will be getting about $9 million to play first, Juan Pierre will be getting $7.5 to play center, Luis Gonzalez will be getting $7.35 million to play left, Randy Wolf will be getting $8 million to fill out the rotation, and Jason Schmidt will be getting about $16 million to be the ace. That’s around $48 million committed to the 2007 season for five new players.

If you’re going to spend that kind of money, don’t you think you should try to maximize your production? Why pay two outfielders and a first baseman $22 million when you have three capable guys ready to step in for close to the league minimum? With JD Drew opting out of his contract, you might need to add one new bat, but James Loney, Matt Kemp, and Andre Ethier will give you solid production at those positions and allow you to spend your money elsewhere. In all honesty, with the talent the Dodgers have waiting in the wings, Drew’s decision might have been a blessing in disguise.

The Dodgers are shaping up to look like this: Nomar at first, Jeff Kent at second, Rafael Furcal at short, Wilson Betemit at third, Russ Martin at catcher, Gonzalez in left, Pierre in center, and Ethier in right. The rotation looks to be Schmidt, Derek Lowe, Brad Penny, Chad Billingsley, and Wolf, with a solid bullpen headed by Takashi Saito and Jonathan Broxton.

But what could it have been? Let’s start at the beginning and give the Dodgers their $46 million back. Let’s put Loney at first and Kemp in center. Let’s stick with Hong-Chih Kuo as the fifth starter instead of spending $8 million on Wolf. Now we’re looking to fill two spots, one in the outfield and one in the rotation.

Instead of spending $90 million on five seasons of Pierre and three seasons of Schmidt, let’s sign Barry Zito for five years and $90 million. This might even be a little high of an estimate. But we’re paying $18 million and change for Zito and Kemp in 2007 instead of $23.5 million for Schmidt and Pierre. Considering we already have a leadoff hitter in Furcal, wouldn’t this make more sense for our ballclub?

Let’s stick with Gonzalez in left field, even though we might have been able to sign one of the big fish (Alfonso Soriano or Carlos Lee). If we wanted, we could throw $4 million a year at David Dellucci or $5 million a year at Frank Catalanotto. But one year of Gonzo at $7 million is serviceable.

Now, our team looks like this: Loney, Kent, Furcal, Betemit, Martin, Gonzalez, Kemp, and Ethier. Is that so much worse that the lineup listed above? Our rotation is now Zito, Lowe, Penny, Billingsley, and Kuo. Looks pretty good to me. We’ve committed less that $100 million instead of $125 million, we’ve saved $22 million in 2007, and we’ve given our young stars a chance to start and prove they’re not just potential.

If one or two of the kids can’t put it together by midseason, we can always trade for a hitter with an inflated contract, because we’ve saved enough money to take on that kind of contract. For example, we could take on Pat Burrell (owed $27 million over two years) or Geoff Jenkins ($7.5 million for one year or $16 million for two years). Or we could plug the hole with Jacque Jones ($9 million over two years). We could trade one of our pitching prospects for Rocco Baldelli ($26 million over five years). We could pick up Richie Sexson ($28 million over two years) or another first baseman and put Loney in the outfield.

In all of those examples, we’d still spend less than $48 million this year. We’d have an ace with a lot fewer miles on his arm (Schmidt has been in the majors 10 years compared to Zito’s five). Our team would be just as capable at making a run at winning the division in 2007 while being much better off in the coming years.
Image
daullaz
Head Scribe
Head Scribe

User avatar
EditorCafeholicCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerPick 3 Weekly WinnerSweet 16 SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 4884
(Past Year: 56)
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Babel

Postby sharksfan1139 » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:56 pm

Sounds pretty good and maybe even better than what they have now. Saving 25mil is also a huge plus...too bad
25

Image
sharksfan1139
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1191
Joined: 5 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby looptid » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:59 pm

In light of the sellers market for pitching, I kind of liked the Schmidt deal. Wolf isn't terrible either. It's just the Juan Pierre contract that will become the Dodgers' albatross for the last two-to-three years of its length. Blocking Loney by resigning an aging Garciapara wasn't a big plus either.
Image
looptid
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 668
Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: St. Paul, MN

Postby Phatferd » Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:27 am

I'd rather have Schmidt than Zito.
You have no frame of reference, Donny. You're like a child who walks into the middle of a movie...
Phatferd
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 4058
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Highway 10

Postby sportsaddict » Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:40 am

Phatferd wrote:I'd rather have Schmidt than Zito.


The one thing that scares me about Schmidt is he is getting up there in age and is kind of on the downhill with injuries, etc. Zito, because of the market, is getting way too much attention as an elite pitcher when he has been only solid but unspectacular in his past few years. I think its a close call with Schmidt and Zito, but I do think the Dodgers did the right thing here. Only because I don't know if Kemp is the real deal, although I'll admit Pierre is overated.
sportsaddict
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1961
Joined: 2 Aug 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: The good old Midwest

Postby daullaz » Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:51 am

O.K., take Schmidt and save even more money. My point is that if the Dodgers came into the offseason with some kind of reasonable plan and stuck to it, they had the option of going after Zito. If they wanted Schmidt and decided to play all three young guys, they probably could have had Sori or Lee too. They committed $48 million next year to those five players. With just Schmidt and Sori/Lee, they'd have committed $34-36 million. I think a lineup anchored by one of those two guys, along with Kent in the middle and Furcal at the top, would be much better than the one they have now.
Image
daullaz
Head Scribe
Head Scribe

User avatar
EditorCafeholicCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe MusketeerPick 3 Weekly WinnerSweet 16 SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 4884
(Past Year: 56)
Joined: 17 Jan 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Babel

Postby The Cow » Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:20 am

I think saving money is the least of the Dodger's worries. I think they should have spent money, but get some big fish like Soriano or Lee instead of Gonzalez and Nomar. Maybe sign Zito over Schmidt though the Schmidt deal wasn't too bad in light of the Lilly and Meche deals.

The Cow
Give Snakes his due!!!! Snakes deserves the fantasy expert icon!!! Go Snakes!!!!
The Cow
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1754
Joined: 12 May 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Eating refried beans

Postby davidmarver » Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:33 am

I think the Dodgers had two choices:

1. Let the young talent play and develop. If you're competitive near the deadline, you can go get players.

2. Pull the trigger on the Manny deal, to go along with a bunch of offseason signings.

They didn't do either, and now they have Luis Gonzalez in left while their youngsters ride the bench. Doesn't make sense to me.
Image
davidmarver
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Cafe WriterMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyePick 3 ChampionLucky Ladders Weekly WinnerTrivia Time Trial Monthly Winner
Posts: 6154
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: 5.5 Hole


Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: unioreimi and 11 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact