by Coppermine » Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:37 am
pokerplaya wrote:Bannister was a #7 starter. Yawn. I'll take Burgos and his upside over Bannister and his mediocrity any day.
The Mets are quite good at picking up mediocre relievers with huge potential and turning them into excellent bullpen contributors. I wouldn't call Bannister a #7 starter, he pitched quite well before his injury, but I suppose Burgos would be considerably better in the long run and Bannister will probably be a #3 starter in KC.
So who are we going after to bolster the rotation? I'm not liking Zito's pricetag.
If you're a battery, you're either working or you're dead....