Important question:

[Snakes Gould]

i dont think the father would not be supporting the child, just his family right? thats the way i understood this, and i think its a pretty obvious answer that the mother should keep the kid. if you really wanted to punish them you should have asked if they would have sex with their mother to save their father's life...now thats a question....

Yeah, that won't cost a teacher his job.

hahaha...still a good hypothetical though right??? or this one...only applies for a man but...

would you rather have sex with a man or a female monkey (think how close the DNA of a monkey is to that of a human)

I'd have sex with the female monkey, but I'd be afraid of getting ebola.

I'd assume you'd have sex with a female monkey if you had the chance, anyway.

You produce a monkey and we'll just have to see.

But if I get there, and that monkey is a dude, I'm bailing man!

haha oh man....i just always though the monkey or man question was the perfect hypothetical because they are both equally as bad and you can make fun of the person regardless of their choice

[Coppermine]

i dont think the father would not be supporting the child, just his family right? thats the way i understood this, and i think its a pretty obvious answer that the mother should keep the kid. if you really wanted to punish them you should have asked if they would have sex with their mother to save their father's life...now thats a question....

Yeah, that won't cost a teacher his job.

hahaha...still a good hypothetical though right??? or this one...only applies for a man but...

would you rather have sex with a man or a female monkey (think how close the DNA of a monkey is to that of a human)

I'd have sex with the female monkey, but I'd be afraid of getting ebola.

I'd assume you'd have sex with a female monkey if you had the chance, anyway.

You produce a monkey and we'll just have to see.

But if I get there, and that monkey is a dude, I'm bailing man!

haha oh man....i just always though the monkey or man question was the perfect hypothetical because they are both equally as bad and you can make fun of the person regardless of their choice

That's what makes it an important question.

[acsguitar]

Wow this thread is really strange

[PlayingWithFire]

and going downhill very fast...

[Coppermine]

and going downhill very fast...

The importance of General Talk is to keep it from getting too serious.

[The Artful Dodger]

and going downhill very fast...

The importance of General Talk is to keep it from getting too serious.

I didn't read through all the rubbish in the first three pages, but all I have to say is AA is a lousy disciplinarian of a teacher. Next time, just come in dressed like a Jesuit and start smacking desks with yardsticks.

[Omaha Red Sox]

This makes a lot of sense...

If the father's family were diabolical freaks, as all rich people are of course, then the mother should run like hell with her kid and protect him. Or possibly choose to be an adult and get along with her husband so the child could grow up without trauma. But that's just crazy talk......

I think you might be reading too much into the question. If I bring up Hitler, am I suggesting that all Germans are evil? Of course not.

I was in a bad mood earlier today, I apologize. If you didn't mean to stereotype, neither did I.

Also, I don't think you fully understand the question. The parents get along as amiably as possible, given the situation. It's the in-laws that are the problem.

I understood the question. In-laws should never interfere with a marriage or the raising of a grandchild. It would be the father's responsibility to separate himself from his parents and make a family of his own. To allow his parents to interfere with his marriage, and especially his child's upbringing, is cowardice.

To be honest, I found this subject matter, provided to children, to be rather inappropriate. Evil exists, of course, but to display it in a nearly exceptable light is.......yeah...