Art Vandelay wrote:Am I the only person who doesn't claim to know for sure whether OJ is guilty or innocent?
I sure as heck don't know. I will also agree that it's in bad taste, but I can't say I'm surprised. Very little in this day and age actually surprises me anymore...
I'll also add that I think it's a joke that he can be acquitted of the murder on one hand, but be held financially accountable in a wrongful death suit. The system sucks.
Minor League Skilz wrote:The Goldman's and brown's should get a free pass to hire a hit man on OJ.
I can't believe it hasn't happened yet.
If OJ had murdered a member of MY family, I honestly believe I'd have begged, borrowed or stolen -- to get enough money to hire "professionals" to make Simpson pay the ultimate price for what he did. (And I would have paid extra to be assured that it would be as painful as possible).
Furthermore, if I hadn't hired someone yet.... well, now that he's doing this ridiculous book/tv-"hypothetical" thing.... I'd certainly do it now.
Serioulsy, if OJ's life ever comes to an unexpected end, I'll take great pleasure if it turns out that the LA police are unable ever to identify his killer. (Frankly, I hope the detectives never go looking for one).
Lastly, I believe that while he escaped punishment on Earth, SOMEDAY he'll pay for what he did... in hell.
Art Vandelay wrote:Am I the only person who doesn't claim to know for sure whether OJ is guilty or innocent?
I sure as heck don't know. I will also agree that it's in bad taste, but I can't say I'm surprised. Very little in this day and age actually surprises me anymore...
I'll also add that I think it's a joke that he can be acquitted of the murder on one hand, but be held financially accountable in a wrongful death suit. The system sucks.
yea i like joking about how OJ is guilty and i'm about 75% sure he did it...
However, its not like Ron and Nicole were saints weren't the both known drug addicts?
Art Vandelay wrote:Am I the only person who doesn't claim to know for sure whether OJ is guilty or innocent?
I sure as heck don't know. I will also agree that it's in bad taste, but I can't say I'm surprised. Very little in this day and age actually surprises me anymore...
I'll also add that I think it's a joke that he can be acquitted of the murder on one hand, but be held financially accountable in a wrongful death suit. The system sucks.
Agreed and agreed.
Dunno 100% if he did it or not.
The civil suit claiming he was responsible for her death is ridiculous. Might as well sue her mother too, because if her mother had never given birth to her, she never would have died. Stupid lawyers and stupid system. Boo!
Yes doctor, I am sick. Sick of those who are spineless. Sick of those who feel self-entitled. Sick of those who are hypocrites. Yes doctor, an army is forming. Yes doctor, there will be a war. Yes doctor, there will be blood.....
Not sure how others feel about this, but is it safe to say that Robert Blake is pretty much in the same boat as OJ where his guilt is concerned? If I recall, Blake also got off, but lost the civil suit, just like Simpson. I believe the evidence against Blake was almost as "slam dunk" looking as that presented against Simpson.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by acsguitar » Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:05 pm 
