Poker Players' Voting Guide - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to General Talk

Poker Players' Voting Guide

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Poker Players' Voting Guide

Postby RugbyD » Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 am

there are many embedded links in the article that I'm not going to duplicate, so go to the original site if you want to follow them (recommended).

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/116495.html

The Green Felt Revolution?

Radley Balko | November 6, 2006, 2:13pm

A couple of weeks ago, I suggested in a column for Fox News that the Internet gambling ban could motivate an otherwise apolitical group of people -- online poker players -- into political activism. The email response was overwhelming, in part because the column was posted in several poker discussion groups. But by a 10-1 margin, email responders were livid, many claiming to be lifelong Republicans who will now be voting for the Democrats, solely because of the gambling ban.

I'm not sure the Dems would be any better on this, though that magical, mystical, yet-to-actually-be-seen creature, the "Libertarian Democrat," might.

In any case, there seems to be at least some anecdotal evidence that a backlash is in the works. Since President Bush signed the ban into law, poker boards have been trying to organize, with some help from groups like the Poker Players' Alliance.

The primary target seems to be Arizona Sen. John Kyl, chief sponsor of the ban in the Senate, and sponsor of anti-Internet gambling legislation in every Congress since the late 1990s.

The Gambling911.com website in particular has taken in the lead in urging Arizona's Internet gamblers to get to the polls, notably by utilizing the early voting option, to cast their votes for Kyl's Democratic challenger Jim Pederson.

So is it working?

Maybe. Kyl's once double-digit lead has been halved since President Bush signed the gambling ban into law. A few polls even show it to be within the margin of error. More interesting, one survey of early voters actually shows Pederson with a four-point lead, and that's from a sample of voters that were disproportionately Republican in voter registration. Early voters are expected to comprise about 30 percent of Arizona's turnout.

Of course it's possible that Pederson's rise is due more to general nti-GOP backlash than an organized poker campaign against Kyl. But other polls around the country are apparently showing a slight GOP uptick in recent weeks. This one is moving the other way. It's also possible that Kyl will end up winning by the healthy margin polls were showing last month (my guess: he'll win by 4-6 points). But the timing of Pederson's surge certainly suggests that something interesting may be afoot.

A more daunting task for poker enthusiasts would be to begin organizing against Rep. Jim Leach and Rep. Bob Goodlatte for the 2008 election. Those two congressmen shepherded the bill through the House (see my TV debate with the clueless Goodlatte here). Both are in relatively safe districts, so bumping them off would be a huge accomplishment. Unfortunately, the poker lobby seems to be more interested in winning an exemption for poker from the ban as a "game of skill" than a broader, principled effort to revoke the ban in its entirety.

That would be good news for poker players, but bad news for supporters of the idea that gambling at home on one's computer is none of the government's damned business.

ADDENDUM: As a fairly avid player myself, I actually do believe that poker is a "game of skill." The quotes weren't meant to imply sarcasm. And I understand why a group like the PPA would seek an exemption now that the ban has become law. After all, they represent "poker" players, not all online gamblers.

I'm just saying that if this has indeed fired some people up, I hope their motivation would continue beyond just a poker exemption, toward getting the entire ban revoked, and keeping the federal government out of the business of monitoring consensual online activity altogether.
TennCare rocks!!!!
RugbyD
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Cafe Ranker
Posts: 5591
Joined: 7 Dec 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: punting small dogs and being surly

Postby Madison » Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:54 pm

Will be very interesting to see how the elections go. Have to admit I'm a bit selfish and don't care what the reasoning is for legalizing online poker. It's a skill game, and that's the stand a few of the online poker rooms are going to take should there be lawsuit problems. However, if all online gambling is allowed, you won't hear me complain either. I don't really casino gamble online, but if people want to, then I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed to.
Yes doctor, I am sick.
Sick of those who are spineless.
Sick of those who feel self-entitled.
Sick of those who are hypocrites.
Yes doctor, an army is forming.
Yes doctor, there will be a war.
Yes doctor, there will be blood.....
Madison
Mod in Retirement
Mod in Retirement

User avatar
ExecutiveEditorCafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeCafe SpotterInnovative MemberCafe MusketeerPick 3 ChampionMatchup Meltdown SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 53856
(Past Year: 1)
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Taking Souls...


Return to General Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: unioreimi and 2 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Thursday, Aug. 21
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

Houston at NY Yankees
(1:05 pm)
Cleveland at Minnesota
(1:10 pm)
Detroit at Tampa Bay
(1:10 pm)
indoors
Arizona at Washington
(4:05 pm)
LA Angels at Boston
(7:10 pm)
Atlanta at Cincinnati
(7:10 pm)
San Francisco at Chi Cubs
(8:05 pm)
San Diego at LA Dodgers
(10:10 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact