Omaha Red Sox wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. There should be criteria set up that entitles someone to have kids. A test they should have to take to make sure they are fit to handle the enormous responsibilities of raising another human being. I know this is unrealistic, but too many stupid people have kids.
Free Condom?
nah, it's not going to change.
to the woman
Are you interested in joining a 28 teams dynasty league? If so, PM me.
Omaha Red Sox wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. There should be criteria set up that entitles someone to have kids. A test they should have to take to make sure they are fit to handle the enormous responsibilities of raising another human being. I know this is unrealistic, but too many stupid people have kids.
I agree with that, but there are kids like my mother who turned out fine despite having been raised by unfit parents and experiencing a traumatic childhood. The sad fact is that there are a great deal of unfit parents in the world, but it's their decision whether intended or not, as to the parents engaging in an intimate activity with plenty of consequences at the end of the tunnel. Plus, no one likes Big Brother being meddlesome when it comes to extremely personal affairs.
Omaha Red Sox wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. There should be criteria set up that entitles someone to have kids. A test they should have to take to make sure they are fit to handle the enormous responsibilities of raising another human being. I know this is unrealistic, but too many stupid people have kids.
Free Condom?
nah, it's not going to change.
to the woman
How about mandatory 'fixing' (tying the tubes) for those deemed unfit?
Omaha Red Sox wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. There should be criteria set up that entitles someone to have kids. A test they should have to take to make sure they are fit to handle the enormous responsibilities of raising another human being. I know this is unrealistic, but too many stupid people have kids.
Free Condom?
nah, it's not going to change.
to the woman
How about mandatory 'fixing' (tying the tubes) for those deemed unfit?
You Republicans are cruel
Are you interested in joining a 28 teams dynasty league? If so, PM me.
Omaha Red Sox wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. There should be criteria set up that entitles someone to have kids. A test they should have to take to make sure they are fit to handle the enormous responsibilities of raising another human being. I know this is unrealistic, but too many stupid people have kids.
Free Condom?
nah, it's not going to change.
to the woman
How about mandatory 'fixing' (tying the tubes) for those deemed unfit?
Omaha Red Sox wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again. There should be criteria set up that entitles someone to have kids. A test they should have to take to make sure they are fit to handle the enormous responsibilities of raising another human being. I know this is unrealistic, but too many stupid people have kids.
Free Condom?
nah, it's not going to change.
to the woman
How about mandatory 'fixing' (tying the tubes) for those deemed unfit?
You Republicans are cruel
Cruel like a fox!
OH SNIP!!!!
If you're a battery, you're either working or you're dead....
So a woman with 5 kids swings one of them at her boyfriend. Why the surprise?
She's got 5 kids!
She's not married!
Stupid people do stupid things!
No shock here.
I say let some 7 foot, 500 pound guy swing her into a wall until it's her skull that fractures. One less worthless idiot in the world.
Yes doctor, I am sick. Sick of those who are spineless. Sick of those who feel self-entitled. Sick of those who are hypocrites. Yes doctor, an army is forming. Yes doctor, there will be a war. Yes doctor, there will be blood.....
That's awful. I mean, even logically, a baby makes a poor weapon, regardless of the fact that, you know, IT'S A BABY. It's not like babies are mini bundles of brick or anything.
Half Massed wrote:That's awful. I mean, even logically, a baby makes a poor weapon, regardless of the fact that, you know, IT'S A BABY. It's not like babies are mini bundles of brick or anything.
Half Massed wrote:That's awful. I mean, even logically, a baby makes a poor weapon, regardless of the fact that, you know, IT'S A BABY. It's not like babies are mini bundles of brick or anything.
And don't babies have soft heads anyway?
Soft spots, not soft heads - your skull starts out as 8 major plates (on the top of the head) that fuse together along the four major sutures as you develop.