General Error SQL ERROR [ mysql4 ] Table './cafe_forums/baseball_sessions' is marked as crashed and should be repaired [145] An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an administrator if this problem persists.
Santana has a better era than Halladay, a higher whip, a better k/bb ratio, almost 90 more strikeouts, one less win, a better PRC(Pitching Runs Created), a better FIP ( Fielding Independant ERA), and one more win share than Halladay. I can't even find one statistic which shows why Halladay is a better pitcher.
giants! wrote:Santana has a better era than Halladay, a higher whip, a better k/bb ratio, almost 90 more strikeouts, one less win, a better PRC(Pitching Runs Created), a better FIP ( Fielding Independant ERA), and one more win share than Halladay. I can't even find one statistic which shows why Halladay is a better pitcher.
A 3.18 ERA pitching in the AL East is a much greater feat than a 3.03 ERA pitching in the AL Central.
A 1.10 WHIP pitching in the AL East is a much greater feat than a 1.03 WHIP pitching in the AL Central.
Records. Halladay is 16-3. Santana is 15-5.
If this was fantasy baseball, Santana is #1. In the real world, Santana is better in one aspect over Doc and one aspect only, strikeouts.
Santana right now deserves it over anybody (this is assuming Liriano doesn't come back and make some kind of run) as he has a slight ERA+ edge on Doc, but again as I've said in the past, the winner is going to be the pitcher with the most wins just as it basically is every year. At the moment, that's Halladay.