Art Vandelay wrote:Very convenient of them to lose all the evidence of their "moon" landing.
They still have the video footage, you tin foil hat wearing clod.
I get you disagree with him, but is this really necessary?
does "tin hat wearing clod" really seem harsh to you? that would be mean MAYBE if this was the 1920's.
now dont make me "take any wooden nickels" here see?!
Uh, yeah, it is pretty harsh to call someone a clod, especially with a derogatory "tin foil hat wearing" thrown in. It's just instigating and kind of pointless, really.
Art Vandelay wrote:Very convenient of them to lose all the evidence of their "moon" landing.
They still have the video footage, you tin foil hat wearing clod.
I get you disagree with him, but is this really necessary?
does "tin hat wearing clod" really seem harsh to you? that would be mean MAYBE if this was the 1920's.
now dont make me "take any wooden nickels" here see?!
Uh, yeah, it is pretty harsh to call someone a clod, especially with a derogatory "tin foil hat wearing" thrown in. It's just instigating and kind of pointless, really.
ive seen you call yanks04, "the joke of the cafe" countless times. that's about a hundred times worse than tin hat whatever..
Art Vandelay wrote:Very convenient of them to lose all the evidence of their "moon" landing.
They still have the video footage, you tin foil hat wearing clod.
I get you disagree with him, but is this really necessary?
does "tin hat wearing clod" really seem harsh to you? that would be mean MAYBE if this was the 1920's.
now dont make me "take any wooden nickels" here see?!
Uh, yeah, it is pretty harsh to call someone a clod, especially with a derogatory "tin foil hat wearing" thrown in. It's just instigating and kind of pointless, really.
ive seen you call yanks04, "the joke of the cafe" countless times. that's about a hundred times worse than tin hat whatever..