Ursa wrote:Your weekly ERA is your total runs divided by the number of innings pitched, multiplied by nine. If someone gives up 10 runs with no outs, it just adds 10 runs to that formula. Your weekly ERA is NOT the average of all your pitchers ERAs.
Correction: ERA = total runs multiplied by nine, then divided by IP.
Eh, technically the math comes out the same. The only slight difference would be caused by decimal limits on a calculator.[/quote]
Yes, sorry - I deleted my post. You were just too quick for me.
this has to be the single most funny line ive ever seen, INF happens all the time, but inorder to get 270 you have to give up 10runs while getting only 1 out, that is unreal
270 era, that has to hurt! I'm glad he had that kind of day because it gave Sowers a guarantee win at least. But anybody having hudson starting have to be crying after that outing because he got rocked!!!!!!
Padsin05 wrote:this has to be the single most funny line ive ever seen, INF happens all the time, but inorder to get 270 you have to give up 10runs while getting only 1 out, that is unreal
Good note* his out was a K
Yep, since his 270 ERA is a projection of how many runs he would have given up over nine full innings, it's only fair to point out that he also would have stuck out 27 batters. Way to go Luke!
"My cat's breath smells like cat food." - R. Wiggum