deutschland wrote:trade vetoed! i guess i was quite wrong about my offer being fair.
You insinuated yourself in your original post that your trade wasn't fair.
deutschland wrote:While the trade is being reviewed I decide to send the new guy a "fair" offer
When you put fair in quotes, you're saying it's not really fair.
deutschland wrote:, knowing that his current trade will surely get vetoed and that these 2 guys will probably try to work out a better deal. I at least wanted to give the new guy a better idea of what someone like Santana is worth so that he doesn't get screwed by my competition.
To my surprise he accepts the deal.
If your deal was so "fair", then why were you suprised?
deutschland wrote:Fine. I get Santana and he gets some fair value in return (his weaknesses are saves and steals).
"some fair value" being different, of course, than "complete fair value"
deutschland wrote:It eventually gets vetoed by ESPN league commish (surprise, surprise, right?)
I'm sure that's what your friend is saying tonight.