Athlete over rock star. Barely. In the end it came down to this...if I were a rock star, I would go all the way. I mean a complete disregard for all standards of decency. I'd either burn out really quick or die trying.
At least if I was an athlete I would be forced to have a sense of responsibility. In the end, the money and girls would be roughly equal, but I would have much more longevity as a jock.
gotta go with athlete too! what if you were a rockstar and people deemed you "uncool" after a few years, or you didnt get alot of record sales, you could be nothing....
at least being an athlete, you control your own destiny
actor - same thing with rockstar...other people's actions and opinions matter too much
rockstar like who??? the flame can die fast...if you think about it, there arent any "rockstars" nowadays...those the aging old guys of the 70's like mick jaggar....nowadays there are "popstars" like justin timberlake
Snakes Gould wrote:rockstar like who??? the flame can die fast...if you think about it, there arent any "rockstars" nowadays...those the aging old guys of the 70's like mick jaggar....nowadays there are "popstars" like justin timberlake
well, getting to rip Janet Jackson's cloth off in the Super Bowl ain't bad...
I kid, I kid
But when Lambkin asked the question he said that all 3 will have a rather comfortable living.
Are you interested in joining a 28 teams dynasty league? If so, PM me.
I posted rock star in the vote, but after thinking it over, I'd take the athlete role. Just watching Live Aid from 1985, especially the Queen segment, makes anyone with a pulse drop their collective jaws in amazement. To have that kind of control over a crowd of people, every single person singing the songs you wrote in unison...just gives me chills.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by mak1277 » Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:58 pm 
