Tragic, but not nearly as barbaric as female circumcision where the clitoris is surgically removed so the female will not enjoy sex - often performed by a member of the family without anaesthetic.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm.htm
Still holds the MLB record for Grand Slams with 23
stomperrob wrote:Tragic, but not nearly as barbaric as female circumcision where the clitoris is surgically removed so the female will not enjoy sex - often performed by a member of the family without anaesthetic. http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm.htm
stomperrob wrote:Tragic, but not nearly as barbaric as female circumcision where the clitoris is surgically removed so the female will not enjoy sex - often performed by a member of the family without anaesthetic. http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm.htm
stomperrob wrote:Tragic, but not nearly as barbaric as female circumcision where the clitoris is surgically removed so the female will not enjoy sex - often performed by a member of the family without anaesthetic. http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm.htm
Yeah, that practice has never made sense...
Sure it does. If women enjoy sex then they may go and have it with someone who they weren't forced to marry.
stomperrob wrote:Tragic, but not nearly as barbaric as female circumcision where the clitoris is surgically removed so the female will not enjoy sex - often performed by a member of the family without anaesthetic. http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm.htm
Yeah, that practice has never made sense...
Sure it does. If women enjoy sex then they may go and have it with someone who they weren't forced to marry.
stomperrob wrote:Tragic, but not nearly as barbaric as female circumcision where the clitoris is surgically removed so the female will not enjoy sex - often performed by a member of the family without anaesthetic. http://www.religioustolerance.org/fem_cirm.htm
Yeah, that practice has never made sense...
Sure it does. If women enjoy sex then they may go and have it with someone who they weren't forced to marry.
I'm not too familiar with the people who practice such things, but aren't they pretty 'religious'? I mean, they either follow the Bible or the Q'ran right? If that's the case it is completely contradictory as both books teach that sex is to be enjoyed by both the man and the woman.