catchers

[brianj29]

i would rather have florida catcher he has other position elig.

[sportsguy138]

i would rather have florida catcher he has other position elig.

what?

[Red Sox Nation]

i would rather have florida catcher he has other position elig.

what?

He's talking about Josh Willingham. The problem is that in real life, he plays LF more.

[duckmonkey]

I know who he's talking about. I just don't know what he's saying, or why he's making a statement like that. He'd rather have Willingham to what? Fruit Loops? Barbara Streisand? A colon cleansing?

There's no problem (for this year) with him playing OF more, he has his position elitibility for the rest of the year and he's a great backup for Varitek on my team, since Tek sits for Wakefield and occasionally other days too. With Varitek, you almost have to have a backup catcher but carrying someone with catcher-only eligibility is a waste.

Willingham is great to have.

Still...what's the point of the first post?

[Red Sox Nation]

I know who he's talking about. I just don't know what he's saying, or why he's making a statement like that. He'd rather have Willingham to what? Fruit Loops? Barbara Streisand? A colon cleansing?

There's no problem (for this year) with him playing OF more, he has his position elitibility for the rest of the year and he's a great backup for Varitek on my team, since Tek sits for Wakefield and occasionally other days too. With Varitek, you almost have to have a backup catcher but carrying someone with catcher-only eligibility is a waste.

Willingham is great to have.

Still...what's the point of the first post?

I dunno. Does seem pointless.

[The Loveable Losers]

My guess is that the OP meant to post this in reply to another thread but accidentally posted it as a new thread.

[Mashug]

My guess is that the OP meant to post this in reply to another thread but accidentally posted it as a new thread.

I hope so.