by Inukchuk » Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:57 am
I think WEFF can be a decent predictor of the future, just not to the extent that other stats such as ERA and WHIP can. I myself largely ignore Wins when drafting pitchers, but I think that I do it more because I just don't like pitchers with lots of wins but poorer peripherals (in fact, I think it's one of my biggest fantasy faults).
The problem I see is that WEFF, or Wins in general, need a larger sample size (>2 years would be a good number) in order to get decent future predictions. The only thing is, if certain nonpitching variables change (such as offensive changes, managerial switch, a better/worse bullpen, or a trade), which they almost always do, the WEFF may change drastically. Example: if Bartolo Colon went to Seattle, his strikeouts would stay consistent, but his WEFF would probably not.
In my opinion, the only way this stat can be relevant (and predictively better than Wins) is in a case where a pitcher was injured for a part of 1 year (in which case, WEFF is more accurate than Wins), and the rest of the team/management stayed the same for the year before and after...
I think I just convinced myself that this statistic is more trouble than it's worth. I'm also convinced that I still hate Bartolo Colon, no matter how many wins he gets...