pokeyjoe wrote:Sorry if I was blunt, but I mean, yes, morally it's kind of a d*ck move, but it's fair game.
There is nothing morally wrong with it one way or the other. Just because you babble about some claim you are going to put in to another owner does not invalidate that other owner's WW position or morally obligate him to lay off. Like I said, if the owner was such an expert, he wouldn ot have opened his mouth in the first place. You can't expect the other guy to not act because he did not know about player X. Who is too say he would not have reas it on Rotoworld or CBS or wherever the same night or during the waiver period?