pokerplaya wrote:As long as the trade occured before the injury, which it did, I beileve the trade should still stand.
Exactly. Any player can get injured at any time. It's often totally random. What matters is whether people thought it was a fair trade at 3:00.
To put the loss for Matsui's injury on the original owner is no more random or 'fair' a decision than putting it to the new owner. If you think that's a fair thing, then you may as well go back and re-do the whole draft, considering various injuries throughout the league this year.