Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **PlayingWithFire** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:36 pm

What would you think if in a non-keeper.

A contender is making a (fair) trade with a mathmatically eliminated team at the end of the year?

by **nikku88** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:39 pm

I don't see why that's a problem. Should eliminated teams be banned from competing?

by **PlayingWithFire** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:39 pm

nikku88 wrote:I don't see why that's a problem. Should eliminated teams be banned from competing?

well, what's the difference between 11th place and 10th place, some would say, in a 12 teamer?

by **Webster11** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:40 pm

I think its fine. I dont see how its an ethnic question though, maybe you meant ethics ;-)

.

by **wrveres** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:41 pm

its fair play ..

and it should be ethic ... .not ethnic ;-)

by **AcidRock23** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:41 pm

We are having a 'most improved in the second half' award this year to try to keep people into it a bit more. ;-D

by **PlayingWithFire** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:44 pm

what if it's with 1 week left to play and there is nothing more than the difference between 10th or 9th place in it for the non-contender? :-?

by **PlayingWithFire** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:45 pm

wrveres wrote:its fair play ..

and it should be ethic ... .not ethnic

say what?

by **Thriller** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:49 pm

Would you be upset if you were the team still in contention and he was trading with you?

This is why leagues place trade deadlines. It prevents a fire sale to the contenders at the end of the season.

If your league does not have a deadline in place, then what they are doing is fully within the rules.

by **RugbyD** » Tue Mar 14, 2006 7:49 pm

PlayingWithFire wrote:what if it's with 1 week left to play and there is nothing more than the difference between 10th or 9th place in it for the non-contender?

pride.
side bets.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

fantasy ethic question

fantasy ethic question

Who is online