Return to General Talk
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by ukrneal » Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:51 pm
-
ukrneal
- General Manager

- Posts: 2322
- Joined: 29 Jan 2004
- Bases this season: 2
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by acsguitar » Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:16 pm
Thanks dude!

I'm too lazy to make a sig at the moment
-
acsguitar
- Hall of Fame Hero



- Posts: 26722
- Joined: 7 Apr 2004
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Back in General Talk WOOO!!!
by Coppermine » Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:50 am
chadlincoln wrote:If they're owned by a company (Chicago Tribune) you'd think they'd have more to spend on a good team. Bottom line takes first order.
See, If a team is owned by a company, i would think that's the worst that could happen. A company's entire purpose is to increase profits and shareholder wealth. Spending millions on baseball players doesn't make shareholders very happy.
-
Coppermine
- Hall of Fame Hero


- Posts: 8840
- Joined: 6 Sep 2005
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Pennsyltucky
by ukrneal » Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:15 am
Just came across this one. I think this is really what you were looking for.
http://www.businessofbaseball.com/
-
ukrneal
- General Manager

- Posts: 2322
- Joined: 29 Jan 2004
- Bases this season: 2
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by ukrneal » Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:42 am
Apparently Forbes has an annual issue where it estimats the worth of the teams, and you could probably find that now...
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=A ... &type=lgns
-
ukrneal
- General Manager

- Posts: 2322
- Joined: 29 Jan 2004
- Bases this season: 2
- Home Cafe: Baseball
Return to General Talk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ajqpvzdw, ciptplearee, Debra, Demies, DrancereD, Isogspousty, MayoniaCeance, Peegetoupttit, pletcherqzb, RoniLypeintit, ruidgidly, SmitleVem, zasonge62 and 2 guests