H Ramirez or Hardy?

[fantasygeek2006]

Ok, who do you like better? I hated JJ after I saw him hit .187 for my fantasy team last yr, but his 2nd half #'s were outstanding. .308, 8 hrs, 31 rbi.

Ive heard Hanley compared to Jimmy Rollins and Id like to know if this is an accurate comparison, if not who is a good comparison? Who do ya take if you needed a future SS not named Wood/Upton?

[DWright5]

STEPHEN DREW WHO IS THE BEST OF ANYONE THAT YOU MENTIONED!!!!!

[fantasygeek2006]

STEPHEN DREW WHO IS THE BEST OF ANYONE THAT YOU MENTIONED!!!!!

Stephen Drew "sucks"

[rotterdam_82]

STEPHEN DREW WHO IS THE BEST OF ANYONE THAT YOU MENTIONED!!!!!

Stephen Drew "sucks"

Why?

In answer to your question, I have Hardy and I wouldn't trade him for Hanley. No way jose.

[hybrid]

This is a pretty humorous prospect debate. Because Hanley used to be overrated, but since he didn't perform that great in AA people are seeing more of what he really is ... though he is still has that potential word. Now people are all of a sudden starting to overrate Hardy, and based on what? Well because he hit over .300 in not even 200 AB's and having 1 good power month. It's all pretty funny when you look at it and then have someone want to compare to two.

To make it real simple I'll put it like this, they basically have shown they will hit for around the same avg., both should hit around 15 HR's (though Hanley does have the potential to hit more), but Hanely easily has the upper hand when it comes to speed. Hardy won't steal at all and Hanley should get you 20-30 SB's. The x-factor is Hardy should be in quite a bit better line up then Hanley. Anyways hope that helps you out.

[Cleanup13]

Stephen Drew does not suck by any means.