Michael Young or Miguel Tejada?

[kemper5]

I personally like Young a tad better. With Tejada I see him repeating lasts years #'s at a 26-28 HR, 95-98 RBI, .295-.300 ish BA which is great, But I feel his 120-150 RBI days are behind him.. With Young I see a .320+ BA, 20-25 HR and 90-100 RBI's and about 15-20 more runs and more SB's than Tejada. I like Young also because he's in a much stronger lineup with Wilkerson ahead and Tiexera and Blalock behind him. Anyone with me?

[rotterdam_82]

Young seems to be the concensus pick in the drafts so far. Often 5 spots higher than Tejada. Both mid second round in my opinion.

I see Tejada doing a little better than last year in all but average: .290 - 35 - 110 - 90

Young will slip a little: .310 - 25 - 90 - 110 with a couple SB over Tejada.

Pretty close IMO. I'd go with Tejada if forced (I won't be taking either of them).