Points Minus Par (PIMP Data for Points Leagues)

[thinkspin]

bump

when you get to calculating how many point hes projected to have, do you have to change that manually or is there somewhere where you can put a code in?

Glad you gave this a bump, or two, or three...

Anyway, I just add the IP/GP calc to rotospin. Still don't think it matters much.

Yellowdog, let me know if I got it right...

For pitchers: Divide points/IP to get points per inning, which is a better indicator of value than simply going by points.

For Hitters: I usually don't bother with games played. It's not that important.

This is Done. I did both IP and GP...

[yellowdog]

think,

I believe what you did was divide the PiMP by IP. What I like to do is divide points by IP to get points per inning. I then figure PiMP using this number. Read my first post in my top 100 thread. I referred to "PiMP" as "Value". I think you'll see how I figured it.

Edit to add link. http://www.fantasybaseballcafe.com/foru ... p?t=168521

[thinkspin]

I believe what you did was divide the PiMP by IP. What I like to do is divide points by IP to get points per inning. I then figure PiMP using this number. Read my first post in my top 100 thread. I referred to "PiMP" as "Value". I think you'll see how I figured it.

This is the same thing. I display the PMP value and the PMP / IP. When I devide by IP should not matter...

[sorgi2evans]

o nvm, I didn't know that roto times had a calculator

[sorgi2evans]

ok I'm doing this for a 8 man league right now. For pitchers it's 2 SPs, 2 RPs, and 3 Ps. Because of odd settings the closers get more points than the SPs. Should I just assume that the other people will start all closers in the P spots and do the top 40 closers and the top 16 SPs or should I do like 28/28?

[sorgi2evans]

btw, the top 24 RPs are all projected to score more than Santana, the top SP

[thinkspin]

ok I'm doing this for a 8 man league right now. For pitchers it's 2 SPs, 2 RPs, and 3 Ps. Because of odd settings the closers get more points than the SPs. Should I just assume that the other people will start all closers in the P spots and do the top 40 closers and the top 16 SPs or should I do like 28/28?

If the RPs are more valuable than the SPs in your scoring system, then you should take advantage of that. I would say stick with the 40/16 ratio.

If you post the cats, I will check it for you...

[sorgi2evans]

IP (1), W (10), L (-5), CG (5), SHO (10), SV (10), H (-1), R (-1), ER (-1), BB (-1), HBP (-1), K (1), WP (-1), BLK (-1)

[sorgi2evans]

well actually the site I used to calculate it didn't have shutouts or complete games so SPs would go a little higher

[thinkspin]

well actually the site I used to calculate it didn't have shutouts or complete games so SPs would go a little higher

I don't do projections but I do know that those cats usually get overlooked because of the small number produced each year.