perlick29 wrote:Super Smash Revolution is the only reason to even consider buying the system, and Zelda.
Other than that it's tough competition to compete with the two new systems. I actually came in 2nd for a DS at the Temple University super smash brothers tournament. It was pretty exciting.
No one stops me with Samus on this website. No one.
What is super smash revolution?
super smash bros' revolution
it's nintendo's version of a fighter featuring nintendo characters.
perlick29 wrote:Super Smash Revolution is the only reason to even consider buying the system, and Zelda.
Other than that it's tough competition to compete with the two new systems. I actually came in 2nd for a DS at the Temple University super smash brothers tournament. It was pretty exciting.
No one stops me with Samus on this website. No one.
What is super smash revolution?
super smash bros' revolution
it's nintendo's version of a fighter featuring nintendo characters.
Cool...and Perlick is the champion of the universe apparently
perlick29 wrote:Super Smash Revolution is the only reason to even consider buying the system, and Zelda.
Other than that it's tough competition to compete with the two new systems. I actually came in 2nd for a DS at the Temple University super smash brothers tournament. It was pretty exciting.
No one stops me with Samus on this website. No one.
What is super smash revolution?
super smash bros' revolution
it's nintendo's version of a fighter featuring nintendo characters.
Cool...and Perlick is the champion of the universe apparently
Smash Bro's Melee is the only game I play Period. Never been much of a gamer, but that game is the best game I've ever played. It's the perfect game to play with 3 other guys. I know I won't get any of these new systems, but I'll be playing when I visit my buddies in Philly . By the way, Perlick actually came second in Melee competition at Temple University .
Half Massed wrote:That is one funky controller. If Nintendo actually comes out with new games that are innovative or at least interesting, then this could do well.
It's going to take a lot of getting used to I bet.
Please don't let that be the controller!!! Perhaps they'll have backwards controller capability as well, with the Gamecube, N64, and SNES controllers. That would be awesome. Imagine, using the N64 controller to play some of the Gamecube's FPSs, etc...
by curious_george_43545 » Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:00 pm
The controller defiantly does look weird, but I think it does have some potential. All the gaming magazines that have actually used it seem to like it. The first time I saw it though, I defiantly had a moment
The controller for Nintendo's upcoming Revolution home console system is a cordless remote-control-like device designed to be used with only one hand. Two small sensors placed near the TV and a chip inside the controller track its position and orientation, allowing the player to manipulate the action on screen by physically moving the controller itself. For example, you could slash an in-game sword by actually swinging the controller from side to side, turn a race car just by twisting your wrist, or aim your gun in a shooter by pointing the controller where you want to fire.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg... check out the article, this might be a pretty cool concept.