Cleveland Steamers wrote:Those two were pretty good, thanks of the help. Any more would be great and very appreciated.
I know I've said 60 million, which I did read months back, but I would have trouble citing the exact article. I know I read it, and unless that number was wrong, 60 million could be the case. I actually believe the site might have been ESPN.com, but I'm not entirely sure. If I happen to stumble upon it again, I'll provide a link.