Can someone (one of the dozen people who voted for OF, for example) why they prefer just having generic OF spots? I'm curious.
Do you also prefer IF slots over C, 1b, 2b, ss, 3b? What about just simplifying it and making it all utility slots? Heck, why not just give up and play fantasy football if you can't handle a challenge.
I normally play with a LF, RF, and CF because it obviously adds more strategy to the game and makes some players value go up or down but that way bleach mentioned it was actually pretty interesting. I might have to try that sometime.
CF is a unique position, you can't just stick anybody out there, where as the corner OF spots are pretty much innerchangable.
as was mentioned before, in the H2HWS we use 2 OF and 1 CF, which we will be sticking with. It has just a touch more realism to it.
Definitely LF/CF/RF for me - I like the strategy and added difficulty. That said, I really can't stand MI/CI designations they just make no sense to me. If you want realism, and added depth, just play with more teams.
General Error SQL ERROR [ mysql4 ] Table './cafe_forums/baseball_sessions' is marked as crashed and should be repaired  An sql error occurred while fetching this page. Please contact an administrator if this problem persists.