I don't really understand their criteria for "intriguing." I agree with AI, Bowman, Farve, Rodman and some others, but then some I just don't get. I don't know if I put Barkley number 1. Being loud yet entertaining doesn't really do it for me. Same for George Foreman - he just seems like a big dumb happy puppy.
Good point about Bonds, but I don't see it with T.O. Maybe if he were as talented as Jerry Rice, but he's just a punk when it comes down to it.
"Intriguing" is also not the word I'd use for Kournikova. "Smokin", "fine," "bangin", maybe.