Return to Baseball Leftovers
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by TheYanks04 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:20 pm
And according to ESPN:
There are two Disabled Lists, the 15-day and 60-day. The only real difference between them is
that players on the 60-day DL -- sometimes called the Emergency DL -- don't count against a team's 40-man roster.
http://espn.go.com/mlb/s/transanctionsprimer.html
-
TheYanks04
- Hall of Fame Hero

- Posts: 9531
- Joined: 12 Dec 2003
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by mweir145 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:22 pm
TheYanks04 wrote:Then why wouldn't he be number 1 through 10 on the roid testing regimen? He should be peeing into a cup twice a day.
Isn't it supposedly random testing?
25
-
mweir145
- Hall of Fame Hero



- Posts: 16774
- (Past Year: 372)
- Joined: 3 Mar 2005
- Bases this season: 783
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Toronto
by mweir145 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:24 pm
TheYanks04 wrote:And according to ESPN:
There are two Disabled Lists, the 15-day and 60-day. The only real difference between them is that players on the 60-day DL -- sometimes called the Emergency DL -- don't count against a team's 40-man roster.
We don't really know that they don't test 60 day DL guys, because why wouldn't they? What makes those guys ammune to the testing?
25
-
mweir145
- Hall of Fame Hero



- Posts: 16774
- (Past Year: 372)
- Joined: 3 Mar 2005
- Bases this season: 783
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Toronto
by TheYanks04 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:27 pm
Don't know. Someone will have to dig up the MLBPA agreement to find out for sure.
-
TheYanks04
- Hall of Fame Hero

- Posts: 9531
- Joined: 12 Dec 2003
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by TheYanks04 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:30 pm
-
TheYanks04
- Hall of Fame Hero

- Posts: 9531
- Joined: 12 Dec 2003
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Rirruto » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:34 pm
It says that document is from 2003, so wouldn't that be out of date?
-
Rirruto
- General Manager



- Posts: 2525
- Joined: 29 Mar 2004
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Mezzanine Section 12 @ Shea
by mweir145 » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:34 pm
Tavish wrote:It doesn't matter if the player is on the DL or not. Any player can be tested.
Here is a story from a few months ago that suggests Bonds has been tested already this season.
There you go. I don't really believe he's hiding from drug testing because I don't think he can hide.
25
-
mweir145
- Hall of Fame Hero



- Posts: 16774
- (Past Year: 372)
- Joined: 3 Mar 2005
- Bases this season: 783
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Toronto
by thehat » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:35 pm
TheYanks04 wrote:Hi smedia agent blew this one though. Announcing you are out for the season the same day they catch Palmeiro further makes everyone believe he is just hiding out from the testing.
Like Bonds has ever given a rat's rear about what anyone thinks.
My main reaction is that no action this year for BB means less shot for him to catch Aaron, which is fine by me.
-
thehat
- General Manager




- Posts: 3721
- Joined: 1 Jun 2003
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
by blankman » Mon Aug 01, 2005 10:36 pm
TheYanks04 wrote:Hi smedia agent blew this one though. Announcing you are out for the season the same day they catch Palmeiro further makes everyone believe he is just hiding out from the testing.
Definately. His PR guy or agent or even Bonds himself picked the worst time to release the news. Not a good decision for his already damaged credibility.
-
blankman
- Hall of Fame Hero


- Posts: 10770
- Joined: 6 Jul 2003
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
Return to Baseball Leftovers
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: apz, Google [Bot], Nemyar, Thursday, Ursa and 15 guests