Return to Baseball Leftovers
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by acsguitar » Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:51 pm
I think this guy just say to him self "hmmm what totally wrong article can I stir up that has no backing and makes no sense?"
By the way the title of the article is
Rich Harden's two-hitter was every bit as good as Randy Johnson's perfect game.
Harden outperformed Unit in his bid for perfection
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/w ... index.html
I'm too lazy to make a sig at the moment
-
acsguitar
- Hall of Fame Hero



- Posts: 26722
- Joined: 7 Apr 2004
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Back in General Talk WOOO!!!
by Pokey » Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:59 pm
"Here's why Harden's gem was as nearly as impressive as the Unit's perfect game:"
Is this guy 5 years old?
But honestly, his point could be arguable. I won't comment on it because I didn't see Harden's game. But you have to admit that there is often a good amount of luck involved in throwing a perfect game. So I can see the argument that Harden's pitching was more impressive, he just wasn't as lucky.
-
Pokey
- Major League Manager


- Posts: 1144
- Joined: 6 Apr 2004
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Vermont
by pibb55 » Sun Jul 17, 2005 4:54 pm
If you read the article he doesn't even say Hardens was definetely better than RJs, and the articles points are all accurate and I agree with them.
"Rich Harden's two-hit, 6-0 victory against Texas on Thursday night looked just about as impressive."
He just titled it that to attract people and get them to want to read it. I dont see anything wrong with the article....

-
pibb55
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 499
- Joined: 10 Jul 2003
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
Return to Baseball Leftovers
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: A Fleshner Fantasy, Ajqpvzdw, bayside, bleach168, CisedForBryce, diewitsjames, Ender, Fantasy Sports Genie, Google Adsense [Bot], isayfujobu, J35J, jfg, Nariaffobbigh, rich101682, SeskZegergy, SpecialFNK and 23 guests