hooligan1 wrote:The ONLY reason a trade should ever be vetoed is if you have some reason to believe that there is collusion involved. Otherwise, I personally never veto trades. My feeling is that owners should be able to manage their teams the way they see fit. Were it up to me, the veto power would not even be an option in Yahoo public leagues. The private league I'm in does not allow vetos.
And this trade is very fair........
Another "someone has to admit to cheating for you to veto" comment from the peanut gallery. So many of you out there sit there and dont veto to trades that are vetoable because you're waiting for some moron to come out with his cheating ways. You think if Sammy had hit a homerun with a corked bat and found out later it was corked he'd admit it?? No. Same here. NO ONE WILL ADMIT TO COLLUSION. Veto to keep integrity of the league intact if you feel the need. Thats what its there for.
This trade, however, is not vetoable. Not what i would do.. but its not like this is a vetoable trade.