Ok, here's the situation. We're playing with a couple guys who are pretty new at this, I want to see if what I'm doing is generally considered good or bad.
After Magglio's injury, he was waived. I looked at it, thought "no big deal" and moved on. After he cleared waivers, I picked him up off of FA to throw on my DL.
Now, another owner is saying that I'm taking advantage of this guy because evidently he had a DL spot open a few months back and he could have put magglio on it. Now he's saying I should trade back Magglio to the guy who dropped him for nothing. I don't see it that way, I burned a DL slot on this guy for months.
Another owner dropped Bonds about a month ago when he had a DL spot open. A couple of us (myself included) posted in the message board that the league should wait for him to clear waivers so this owner could pick him back up and put him in his DL. His response? "I loathe Bonds with every cell in my body....whomever wants to pick him up, feel free to do so. I have tried to give him away and no one wants him."
After that, I put in a claim for him and got him. I'd been saving my waiver priority all year, and figured Barry could be a great 2nd half shot in the arm.
Now, the guy who's bugging me thinks that I'm taking advantage of this guy because I picked up Bonds.
Now. . .is it something to be proud of that I have Bonds and Magglio? Heck no. Is it unethical? Well, I'm asking you to tell me that.
Last edited by proninja on Mon Jun 20, 2005 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.