From everything I've read about it, it just seems the prosecution's case was extremely weak. "Reasonable doubt" isn't hard to find when the mother is all high and mighty (even went so far as to cop and attitude and snap her fingers at the jury while on the stand), sued J.C. Penny for being touched and got something like $150,000 for it, etc. etc, etc.
Is he guilty? I don't have any idea. Would my son spend a night at Neverland? Not a chance in the world. I don't trust him at all, but when it comes to the case, it just had too many holes in it for there not to be some sort of doubt that everyone was being honest. Really hard to say since I was definitely not in the courtroom, but I don't think "reasonable doubt" wasn't raised in the majority of the juror's eyes.
I still wouldn't trust him with my son though.
Yes doctor, I am sick.
Sick of those who are spineless.
Sick of those who feel self-entitled.
Sick of those who are hypocrites.
Yes doctor, an army is forming.
Yes doctor, there will be a war.
Yes doctor, there will be blood.....