You say this trade was accepted right after Walker reeled off 6 straight saves. His last three outings have been horrendous, and I think some people are basing the fairness of the deal on what he has done since the trade, which is wrong. If Walker had gone scoreless in his last three outings since the deal was made, would everyone still be telling you this is a shady deal? Maybe, but I would imagine there would be far less.
davus wrote:Whatever. This thread should be locked or deleted. If you want to bitch about the trade, then there is a thread I posted in the trade forum for that. Be my guest.
C'mon bro. You asked for opinions on the situation and you got a ton of them, far more than I have ever seen anyone else get. Speaking about the fairness of the deal goes hand in hand with whether you should banish him from the league, or whatever your original post was about.