inge qualifies at catcher in a head to head ten team leage who will be better in head to head at the catcher position inge or kendal who will have the better year?
by SoxWillNeverWinAgain » Thu Apr 14, 2005 9:37 am
Inge shouldn't be starting in a 10 team league? Have you checked out his numbers to start the season? He had 7 triples last year, getting 7 triples out of your catcher position is huge (in my league it is anyways since we count triples). He has some power, some speed, and he's hitting. I'm very happy with Inge... in fact I've benched Estrada for Inge.
Kendall over Inge. One could make the arguement that inge should be starting in a 10 team 5x5, but it would be a lot more convinving if he were not hitting dead last in the order. But if he keeps hitting as he is and moves up in the order, he will have good enough run production playing every day that he probably should be a starter in a 10 team league.
SoxWillNeverWinAgain wrote:Inge shouldn't be starting in a 10 team league? Have you checked out his numbers to start the season? He had 7 triples last year, getting 7 triples out of your catcher position is huge (in my league it is anyways since we count triples). He has some power, some speed, and he's hitting. I'm very happy with Inge... in fact I've benched Estrada for Inge.
Whoa. You can take those 7 triples to the bank, but I can assure you that you wont be going to the bank much more this season. Kendall is much better in the long run because of that average...and Kendall has some wheels too. I am not concerned with getting triples from my catcher...what I am concerned with is staying away from .250 batting averages.
"I live for this game. If baseballs went well with eggs, Id eat them for breakfast..."
definitely kendall...but they are't as far apart as some of these chumps would have you believe; with 600 ab's this year inge should handily beat kendall in both rbi and homers - as others have mentioned, the question marks are his average and where he hits in the lineup