Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **Mercer Boy** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:03 am

Would anyone like to reduce the time period for questions to be answered? It seems like a week is a long time to wait to see who gets a question right...most of us reply within a day or two from when the message is sent. Maybe a three day period would be sufficient? :-?

menyak · by **menyak** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:06 am

Mercer Boy wrote:Would anyone like to reduce the time period for questions to be answered? It seems like a week is a long time to wait to see who gets a question right...most of us reply within a day or two from when the message is sent. Maybe a three day period would be sufficient?

That's a good question, but likely still too early to tell. Let's wait until we have the trivia folder, then there will be no notification popups anymore, and people will just casually open their trivia boxes when they feel like it. :-?

by **SHOCKandAWE** » Sat Apr 09, 2005 8:07 am

Mercer Boy wrote:Would anyone like to reduce the time period for questions to be answered? It seems like a week is a long time to wait to see who gets a question right...most of us reply within a day or two from when the message is sent. Maybe a three day period would be sufficient?

\

I would have to agree. I say 60 hours is enough time. That is 2 1/2 days

by **BigMusky** » Sun Apr 10, 2005 9:19 am

A week is good if you travel or ever go anywhere on vacation.

by DK » Sun Apr 10, 2005 7:59 pm

I may have missed this in the rules, but I was wondering... What happens if nobody gets the question correct?

menyak · by **menyak** » Sun Apr 10, 2005 9:03 pm

DK wrote:I may have missed this in the rules, but I was wondering... What happens if nobody gets the question correct?

It simply remains unanswered.

by DK » Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:45 pm

menyak wrote:
DK wrote:I may have missed this in the rules, but I was wondering... What happens if nobody gets the question correct?

It simply remains unanswered.

Well, if there's a week deadline, and I stump everyone with a question, shouldn't I get a point?

by **LBJackal** » Mon Apr 11, 2005 7:36 pm

DK wrote:
menyak wrote:
DK wrote:I may have missed this in the rules, but I was wondering... What happens if nobody gets the question correct?

It simply remains unanswered.

Well, if there's a week deadline, and I stump everyone with a question, shouldn't I get a point?

No that would start havok... all you'd see is impossible questions that nobody can answer.

And also... nobody answered the first question I posted. Time is ticking }:-)

by DK » Mon Apr 11, 2005 7:41 pm

LBJackal wrote:
DK wrote:
menyak wrote:
DK wrote:I may have missed this in the rules, but I was wondering... What happens if nobody gets the question correct?

It simply remains unanswered.

Well, if there's a week deadline, and I stump everyone with a question, shouldn't I get a point?

No that would start havok... all you'd see is impossible questions that nobody can answer.

And also... nobody answered the first question I posted. Time is ticking

Well, a bunch of people answered my question, they just all got it wrong. Maybe if a certain amount of people guess or something?

by **LBJackal** » Mon Apr 11, 2005 9:13 pm

DK wrote:
LBJackal wrote:
DK wrote:
menyak wrote:
DK wrote:I may have missed this in the rules, but I was wondering... What happens if nobody gets the question correct?

It simply remains unanswered.

Well, if there's a week deadline, and I stump everyone with a question, shouldn't I get a point?

No that would start havok... all you'd see is impossible questions that nobody can answer.

And also... nobody answered the first question I posted. Time is ticking

Well, a bunch of people answered my question, they just all got it wrong. Maybe if a certain amount of people guess or something?

You're question was ridiculous and misleading though. The last thing I wasnt is people doing that just so they can get a trivia point.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Trivia Future

Who is online