yes but a 1.9 WHIP??
here are my projections
31 saves
2.89 ERA
1.36 WHIP
85 Ks
and he should probably get about 6 or 7 wins
close to yours but a better WHIP
I don't think so either. With 32 saves, I would assume that would make the Nationals a team with a winning record maybe even competing for a wild card spot. Let's not forget these are still the Expos.
paw75 wrote:I don't think so either. With 32 saves, I would assume that would make the Nationals a team with a winning record maybe even competing for a wild card spot. Let's not forget these are still the Expos.
Not necessarily...the Pirates' closers generally save between 35-45 games a year, and they haven't been over .500 in 12 years.
It just means that the team doesn't blow others out...they always have to win close games.
The One, The Only, The Incomparable Mercer Boy.
MySpace blog (updated 6/21 - Pirates walkout.)
Not necessarily. Bad teams can have closers that post 30-35 saves without much sweat. Win 60-65 games it means they save about half the games which is not that unusual. Mo can save 50 on a Yankee team that will win 100+, so a team winning 65 can have a closer with 30-32 saves. We have seen Mike Williams save 50 for a Pitts team, Graves save 40+ for a bad Cincy team and Kolb save a good number for the Brewers. Decent talents on bad teams will get saves.