lesgrant puts up a better argument than you, and that's not a compliment to anyone.
This debate is older than mud. Look up "Bonds" with my name in the search query to see my opinion.
what's wrong with attempting to put together a detailed investigation? There's more references here than I've seen in other debates.
It is pretty funny to see people in such intractable denial that they won't even consider the possibility of Bond's taking roids unless they see him walking along the street with a syringe hanging from his ass.
lesgrant puts up a better argument than you, and that's not a compliment to anyone.
This debate is older than mud. Look up "Bonds" with my name in the search query to see my opinion.
what's wrong with attempting to put together a detailed investigation? There's more references here than I've seen in other debates.
It is pretty funny to see people in such intractable denial that they won't even consider the possibility of Bond's taking roids unless they see him walking along the street with a syringe hanging from his ass.
It's funny that you make ridiculous generalizations based on speculated, spun opinions by media, who despise Bonds might I add.
lesgrant puts up a better argument than you, and that's not a compliment to anyone.
This debate is older than mud. Look up "Bonds" with my name in the search query to see my opinion.
what's wrong with attempting to put together a detailed investigation? There's more references here than I've seen in other debates.
It is pretty funny to see people in such intractable denial that they won't even consider the possibility of Bond's taking roids unless they see him walking along the street with a syringe hanging from his ass.
It's funny that you make ridiculous generalizations based on speculated, spun opinions by media, who despise Bonds might I add.
You should see some of the debates we've had...
agreed, I have poured more facts and links in to the cafe regarding Bonds than I care to remember ...
I sure as hell am not going to back though it all for somebody who says that Barry was never even a HOF player in the first place.
lesgrant puts up a better argument than you, and that's not a compliment to anyone.
This debate is older than mud. Look up "Bonds" with my name in the search query to see my opinion.
what's wrong with attempting to put together a detailed investigation? There's more references here than I've seen in other debates.
It is pretty funny to see people in such intractable denial that they won't even consider the possibility of Bond's taking roids unless they see him walking along the street with a syringe hanging from his ass.
It's funny that you make ridiculous generalizations based on speculated, spun opinions by media, who despise Bonds might I add.
You should see some of the debates we've had...
can't say i recall making generalizations about Smilin' Barry. i've skipped through other debates cuz they do get boring and lack details. this one has a bunch of links in one place, some of which get very detailed.
lesgrant puts up a better argument than you, and that's not a compliment to anyone.
This debate is older than mud. Look up "Bonds" with my name in the search query to see my opinion.
what's wrong with attempting to put together a detailed investigation? There's more references here than I've seen in other debates.
It is pretty funny to see people in such intractable denial that they won't even consider the possibility of Bond's taking roids unless they see him walking along the street with a syringe hanging from his ass.
It's funny that you make ridiculous generalizations based on speculated, spun opinions by media, who despise Bonds might I add.
You should see some of the debates we've had...
can't say i recall making generalizations about Smilin' Barry. i've skipped through other debates cuz they do get boring and lack details. this one has a bunch of links in one place, some of which get very detailed.
RugbyD wrote:can't say i recall making generalizations about Smilin' Barry. i've skipped through other debates cuz they do get boring and lack details. this one has a bunch of links in one place, some of which get very detailed.
You made generalizations about his defenders. Did you not read what you wrote?
Any debate I have about Bonds is nothing but the facts. Simple.
RugbyD wrote:can't say i recall making generalizations about Smilin' Barry. i've skipped through other debates cuz they do get boring and lack details. this one has a bunch of links in one place, some of which get very detailed.
You made generalizations about his defenders. Did you not read what you wrote?
Any debate I have about Bonds is nothing but the facts. Simple.
Just as you did by claiming that his feelings toward Bonds are a result of the media.
RugbyD wrote:can't say i recall making generalizations about Smilin' Barry. i've skipped through other debates cuz they do get boring and lack details. this one has a bunch of links in one place, some of which get very detailed.
You made generalizations about his defenders. Did you not read what you wrote?
Any debate I have about Bonds is nothing but the facts. Simple.
WHat i said addresses a very specific sect of Bonds-backers, those who cover their ears and shut their eyes and scream "LALALALALALALALALALA!!!!!!" until you go away, hence the hyperbole of the previous post. you don't appear to be one of these, but they certainly exist and they probably think OJ is innocent too.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by RugbyD » Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:16 pm 
